Document: RESPONSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/287.0 RESPONSE 2019-06-11 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-11
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court document reflects a concerning disregard for Aaron Surina’s rights as a respondent. The document is a notification of an order return, which reveals several procedural missteps or oversights that may potentially harm Aaron’s ability to adequately defend himself. Firstly, the initial order is not on file at SPD Records, which can obstruct Aaron’s understanding of the claims against him. The lack of a law enforcement sheet provided, relationship specification, dates-of-birth for involved parties, and law enforcement restraints listed also contribute to an incomplete picture of the allegations, making it challenging for Aaron to mount a defense.
Possibly the most concerning issue is the absence of a judge’s signature, which is a basic requirement for a court order to be valid and enforceable. This lack could suggest administrative negligence or an intentional effort to bypass due process. Finally, the order has not been entered into the law enforcement records system (LERMS/WACIC/NCIC), which could potentially lead to enforcement issues, further complicating the situation for Aaron.
These issues collectively suggest a significant bias against Aaron, as they deny him his right to a fair and transparent legal process. He is entitled to complete and accurate information about the claims and orders against him, and the court’s failure to provide this is a clear injustice.
About The Author
