Document: DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/290.0 DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT 2019-06-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT
Aaron Surina alleges that he has been a victim of significant injustice and unethical conduct in his divorce case. He asserts that the court proceedings have been heavily biased against him due to the manipulation of the legal system by his ex-spouse, Sirinya, her legal team, and her associate, Mr. Carl Wilson. He claims they coerced Sirinya into signing a full power of attorney over to Mr. Wilson, leading to the eviction of Sirinya and their children from their home, and burdening her with a debt of approximately $77,000.
Mr. Surina accuses Sirinya’s legal team, especially Stanley Kempner and Keith Glanzer, of misleading the court and forcing the sale of his property without his consent. He alleges they obtained orders prohibiting him from participating in the transaction process, leading to his eviction from his own property. He also criticizes the court’s decision to allow the sale of his property without his involvement, claiming it as an injustice as he is the sole title holder.
Furthermore, he contends that Mr. Glanzer acted unethically by serving as counsel in a case where he was also the key witness, presenting false evidence against Mr. Surina. He argues that they used misinformation to secure the deed to his property and orchestrated a series of actions that have led to his unjust eviction. He also asserts that his previous attorney, Richard Kuck, was manipulated by Mr. Glanzer to sign a CR2A agreement without his knowledge or consent.
Mr. Surina has been penalized with approximately $28,000 in judgements or sanctions for refusing to sign what he believes to be fraudulent real estate transactions. He requests that the court reverse these judgments and charge Mr. Glanzer for the losses inflicted on him, his wife, and their children due to the alleged fraud.
Moreover, Mr. Surina criticizes the court’s presumption that he poses a threat to his wife and children, a claim he vehemently denies. He states that he has submitted a 50/50 parenting plan to the court multiple times, despite claims from Sirinya to the contrary. He accuses Sirinya’s counsel of preventing court proceedings when Sirinya would be present to witness his proposal.
Mr. Surina expresses concern about the potential risk of international child abduction, alleging that Sirinya has applied for foreign passports without his consent and threatened to take the children to Thailand. He argues that the court and his own lawyers lack the necessary understanding of international laws to effectively handle this situation. He requests a mutual restraining order to prevent either parent from taking the children out of the U.S without agreement from both parents and a court order.
In conclusion, Mr. Surina believes that these court proceedings reflect a significant degree of unfairness and unethical conduct against him, and he requests the court to rectify this injustice.
About The Author
