Document: DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/295.0 DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT 2019-06-14 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-14
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents present a compelling narrative of potential judicial bias, unethical conduct, and systemic failure, significantly disadvantaging Aaron Surina in his ongoing child custody case.
Despite Aaron’s persistent requests for a fair 50/50 custody arrangement, his petitions have been repeatedly denied, seemingly without reasonable justification. The documents suggest that the decisions limiting his custody rights appear to be influenced more by financial considerations rather than the children’s best interests.
The documents reveal instances of potential professional misconduct. Keith Glanzer, a legal representative in the case, is accused of making threatening remarks about Aaron and issuing restraining orders against him, infringing on his parental rights. Glanzer is also alleged to have misled the court and Sirinya Surina, inhibiting her from making informed decisions.
Additionally, these documents demonstrate that Aaron has been unfairly depicted in court filings, with numerous contradictions and untruths presented in the case. This misrepresentation extends to his peaceful co-parenting relationship with Sirinya and his desire for a fair parenting agreement. Despite the court-imposed restrictions, Aaron has maintained a commendable relationship with Sirinya and their children.
Significantly, the documents reveal a substantial communication gap and lack of coordination amongst the authorities involved in the case, including the Family Court, attorneys, the police, and Child Protective Services. These entities seem to shirk responsibility and dismiss Aaron’s pleas for help, reinforcing the narrative of systemic bias against him.
In conclusion, the court documents suggest that Aaron Surina is enduring unjust treatment in his child custody case. His appeals for equal custody are unduly denied, and his attempts to uncover the truth are dismissed by various authorities. These proceedings reflect a potential bias against him and an apparent disregard for the best interests of the children.
About The Author
