Document: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/298.0 AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER 2019-06-17 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-17
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document Title: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
The document reveals instances of perceived bias and potential unfairness against Aaron Surina in his legal dispute with his ex-wife, Sirinya Surina. Sirinya’s accusations of physical abuse and controlling behavior towards Aaron, which lack concrete evidence, could be seen as an attempt to unfairly sway the court’s opinion against him.
Sirinya’s dismissal of Aaron’s sexual abuse allegations against Carl Wilson, who allegedly assaulted their son, could be viewed as an injustice if Aaron’s concerns for his son’s safety are being dismissed. Her portrayal of Carl and On Wilson as saviors rather than proxies could be seen as an attempt to manipulate the court’s perception of Aaron.
Aaron’s so-called “frivolous motions and court actions”, as described by Sirinya, are likely his attempts to seek justice and protect his children and should not be misconstrued as a financial strain on Sirinya. The court’s decision to shorten Aaron’s hearing time for a change in primary placement, which Sirinya finds unfair, might be viewed as necessary from Aaron’s perspective to ensure his children’s well-being.
Sirinya’s refusal to entertain a 50/50 parenting plan due to her allegations of Aaron’s abuse could be seen as an effort to deny him equal rights to his children if these allegations aren’t fully substantiated. Her accusation of Aaron withholding $56,000 in her attorney’s trust account, depicting him as financially manipulative, could be seen as a tactic to discredit him if Aaron has valid reasons for holding the money.
Sirinya’s allegations that Aaron is attempting to have her attorney removed from the case and ‘browbeating’ her into agreeing with him lack evidence and could reflect negatively on Aaron without substantiation. The dismissal of Aaron’s proposal for a 50/50 parenting plan due to an alleged ‘crisis of homelessness’ seems unjust, especially when Sirinya acknowledges that this issue would be resolved before the trial or hearing.
Finally, Sirinya’s request to quash Aaron’s concerns regarding primary placement and international travel, along with her demand for the court to award her attorney fees and costs, may reflect an unfairness in the proceedings. These instances suggest a disregard for Aaron’s rights and interests as a father and may reflect a bias against him in the legal dispute.
About The Author
