Document: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/299.0 AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER 2019-06-17 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-17
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
The court documents, examined from the perspective of Aaron Surina, have highlighted numerous instances of bias, unfairness, and potentially unethical conduct against him in his fight for justice for his children.
Aaron’s ex-wife, Sirinya Surina, has portrayed him negatively, making severe allegations including an obsession with ‘international abduction’ and disruption of trial preparation. Her portrayal of Aaron’s pursuit of a 50/50 parenting plan as selfish and contrary to the children’s best interests, alongside accusations of Aaron being an obstacle in the sale of their marital home, paint a one-sided picture that may be perceived as unjust.
Furthermore, Sirinya’s claim that her attorney is acting solely on her directives could be seen as an attempt to deflect responsibility and discredit Aaron’s legitimate concerns about the attorney’s conduct.
Sirinya’s affidavit also suggests a potential bias in the communication regarding their children. She alleges that Aaron constantly initiates litigation in various courts, which Aaron might interpret as an unfair portrayal of his efforts to protect his children. Sirinya’s shock at Aaron’s attempt to modify the parenting plan just before the trial could be seen by Aaron as an attempt to discredit his involvement in his children’s lives.
The most damaging accusation is the insinuation of domestic violence by Sirinya, which Aaron may see as an unjust accusation without a fair chance for defense. Moreover, there is apparent bias in not mentioning Aaron’s request for an Emergency Ex-Parte Restriction on international travel for his son, reflecting a disregard for his concerns for his children’s safety.
Aaron’s struggle to obtain an ex-parte order to restrict his son’s international travel due to fears of child abduction has been met with procedural hurdles, forcing him into difficult personal decisions just to ensure his son’s safety. His grievance against lawyer Keith A. Glanzer for alleged unethical representation was dismissed by the WSBA’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel, further pointing to potential systemic bias.
In conclusion, Aaron Surina’s attempts to protect his children have, from his perspective, been met with bias, unfairness, and potential unethical behavior from the opposing party and their counsel. His experience raises serious concerns about the impartiality of the legal proceedings, with an apparent focus on procedures rather than the best interests of the children involved.
About The Author
