Document: CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET-PROPOSED
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/3.0 CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET-PROPOSED 2017-08-14 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-08-14
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET-PROPOSED
The court documents indicate a potential bias against Aaron Surina in the child support proceedings, seemingly favoring his ex-spouse, Siriniya Surina, in an unjust manner. The income imputed for Siriniya is listed as $0, contrasting starkly with Aaron’s recorded income of $9,167. This discrepancy leads to Aaron bearing an unbalanced child support obligation, with him being required to pay $1,425.81 per month, while Siriniya’s obligation is only $372.19, despite any undisclosed actual income.
The document further widens this gap in financial obligations by attributing significantly less total monthly deductions from gross income to Siriniya ($145.81) compared to Aaron ($2,440.51). There appears to be no consideration for Aaron’s substantial monthly taxes and social security deductions when calculating the child support obligation.
Moreover, the document omits any reflection of health care, day care, or special child rearing expenses, potentially creating an unfair presumption that Aaron is solely responsible for these costs. It also fails to account for any non-recurring income or income from other sources, which could further skew the child support calculation against Aaron.
The standard calculation for child support reveals an extraordinary discrepancy between the amounts Aaron and Siriniya are expected to contribute. Aaron is expected to pay approximately four times more than Siriniya for both 45% of each parent’s net income and 25% of each parent’s basic support obligation. This disproportion could imply a biased evaluation of Aaron’s financial capabilities, potentially without considering his other financial obligations.
In addition, the document does not provide detailed insight into each party’s household assets and debts or the income of any new partners or other adults in the household. This lack of transparency may suggest an unfair evaluation of the financial circumstances of both parents.
Overall, the document exhibits a clear imbalance in favor of Siriniya Surina, leading to a disproportionate financial burden on Aaron Surina. These factors could signify potential injustices, indicating unethical conduct or bias against Aaron in the calculation of child support obligations.
About The Author
