Document: REPORT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/300.0 REPORT 2019-06-18 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-18
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents reveal several potential areas of concern that could be perceived as bias or unfair treatment against the father, Aaron Surina.
Firstly, the emphasis on the requirement for complete form completion under the threat of the case not being set on the docket implies a lack of flexibility in administrative procedure, which may be perceived as procedural injustice.
Furthermore, the document mentions a contempt of court regarding the parenting plan/residential schedule, but it does not provide any details about the circumstances of this contempt. This lack of clarity may be viewed as an attempt to paint Aaron Surina in a negative light without proper context or opportunity for explanation.
The document also indicates that there is an “adequate cause for custody modification,” which suggests that the court is considering altering the current custody arrangements without providing a clear rationale. This lack of transparency may be seen as an example of bias against Surina.
Additionally, the document mentions “objections to late filed declarations,” but again, does not provide any context or details. It is unclear whether these objections are related to Surina’s filings, which could potentially indicate an unfair procedural hurdle placed in his way.
Lastly, it is stated that “those efforts were unsuccessful” in reference to attempts at resolving issues or settling all motions. This may give an impression that Surina is uncooperative, without acknowledging his right to dispute and defend his interests. This could be seen as an attempt to undermine Surina’s position, thus suggesting bias.
In conclusion, the document displays potential bias and procedural unfairness against Aaron Surina, possibly jeopardizing his quest for justice.
About The Author
