Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/303.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2019-06-18 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-18
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The trial minutes of the case SURINA, SIRINY A VS SURINA, AARON M reveal potential bias and unfair treatment towards Aaron Surina. The court hearing took place without legal representation on Mr. Surina’s side, while Mrs. Surina was represented by a legal counsel, Keith Glanzer. This imbalance of legal representation could have negatively influenced the outcome of the hearing, as Mr. Surina was left to navigate the legal process alone while the petitioner had professional assistance.
The document also indicates that the court ruled in favor of an Order to Quash the immediate restraining order and for CR11 sanctions without providing clear information on the reasons for such a decision. Given the lack of legal representation for Mr. Surina, it could be argued that the court did not ensure a fair hearing. Moreover, the presence of a Thai language interpreter suggests potential language barriers which might have further complicated Mr. Surina’s understanding and participation in the court hearing.
Overall, the document suggests a possible denial of due process for Mr. Surina, potentially indicating judicial bias and unethical behavior in the proceedings.
About The Author
