Document: SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/305.0 SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT 2019-06-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents reflect a potentially biased and unfair decision against Aaron Michael Surina. The documents detail the satisfaction of judgments against Aaron, which seem to be overly burdensome without clear justification. The judgments were satisfied through the sale of real estate property, which could potentially infringe on Aaron’s property rights. The total amount of the judgments, nearly $28,300, was paid into a trust for further disbursement by court order, suggesting that Aaron may not have had control over the distribution of his funds. The judgments were entered on multiple occasions, which could be seen as a continuous financial penalty against Aaron. The satisfaction of these judgments was authorized by Sirinya Surina, the petitioner, and not Aaron, which could potentially show a lack of his involvement or consent in the process. This could also indicate an exclusion of Aaron’s perspective or rights in the legal proceedings. The document fails to provide a comprehensive reason for these judgments, leading to a potential perception of bias or unfairness against Aaron within the court proceedings.
About The Author
