Document: REPORT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/324.0 REPORT 2019-08-07 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-08-07
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Final summary:
Aaron Surina, a dedicated father, has been subjected to repeated instances of unethical conduct, bias, and potential injustices throughout his court proceedings. Despite his continuous efforts to protect and provide for his children, Surina finds himself buried under unfair and potentially illegal financial burdens, orchestrated by parties exploiting the situation for their own benefit.
Surina alleges that Carl B. Wilson, who funded the lawsuit and appears to be the primary client of Sirinya Surina’s counsel, Mr. Glanzer, benefits from all the assets his wife receives in this case. He also accuses Wilson of having a financial motive, attempting to secure child support payments through an exploitative contract that Sirinya was forced into signing.
Surina claims that Stanley Kempner, Keith Glanzer, and others representing Sirinya, Carl Wilson, and Keith Glanzer have been instrumental in facilitating these injustices. Mr. Glanzer, in particular, seems to have manipulated legal proceedings to delay the sale of Surina’s separate property, misrepresented his financial status, and opposed Surina’s request for a fee waiver for the Guardian ad Litem (G.A.L.) fees, suggesting that Surina was trying to avoid the services, leading to a lack of oversight for their children.
Furthermore, Surina alleges that Sirinya was coerced into signing complex loans and legal documents that she didn’t understand, including a power of attorney to Carl. This has resulted in her becoming financially dependent on Carl and losing control over the welfare of their children. Surina asserts that Carl’s undue influence is even recognized by Child Protective Services.
Despite Surina’s numerous requests, the court has failed to enforce the appointment of a G.A.L., adding to the perceived bias against him. He feels he has had to continually file motions to obtain court-ordered services due to the opposing counsel’s influence and refusal to comply.
Surina has also been subjected to intense and potentially unfair financial scrutiny, with a court requirement for him to submit a range of financial documents. The appointment of a new trustee, Paul L. Calabro, in place of the originally named trustee, Richard Perednia, suggests potential bias in the legal proceedings, particularly if the newly appointed trustee has any connection or affiliation with the opposing party.
The court documents impose an unfair financial burden on Surina, requiring him to pay a significant sum of $2,025.00, representing 81% of the total cost for a court-ordered Guardian Ad Litem (GAL). He is also shouldering a significant amount of the health care expenses for his children, and these costs do not adequately reflect in his support credits.
Surina’s child support obligations reveal potential bias and unfairness against him. Despite his low income, the calculation for his basic child support obligation is determined without considering the self-support reserve. The court also considered his income from overtime and second jobs in the child support calculations, despite these extra hours being temporary and no longer part of his income.
In conclusion, Aaron Surina has been subjected to a series of potential injustices, including unethical conduct, judicial bias, and unfair treatment. This situation not only impacts Surina but also potentially leaves his ex-spouse, Sirinya, in a financially exploitative situation. Surina calls for the court to address these issues to help them exit this difficult situation.
About The Author
