Document: PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/342.0 PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN 2019-12-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-12-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document Title: PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN
This court document outlines the proposed parenting plan for Aaron Surina’s children, David and Andrew. The document reveals alleged bias and unfair treatment against Mr. Surina by the court. Despite credible reports of abuse and neglect about the children’s mother, Sirinya Polarj Surina, no limitations were placed on her. In contrast, the court accused Mr. Surina of abusive use of conflict and temporarily limited his decision-making and communication with his children. This decision was made despite the results of the Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI-2) deeming Mr. Surina a fit parent with no risk to his children.
The court’s actions, which include moving the case to a different judge and redirecting the proposed evaluation from the petitioner to the respondent, have been perceived by Mr. Surina as biased. The court’s decision to increase the children’s time with their father, despite the allegations against him, can be seen as contradictory and may be perceived as unfair treatment. The court has also granted Sirinya sole authority to make major decisions about school, education, and non-emergency health care for the children, seemingly without reason to limit shared decision-making, thereby infringing on Aaron’s parental rights.
The allocation of time spent with the children appears biased, particularly evident in the summer and holiday schedules. The plan does not clearly state the time allocation during these periods, potentially leading to disputes and favoring one parent over the other.
The document also reveals potential bias in the allocation of important holidays such as Memorial Day and Labor Day, limiting Aaron’s opportunities to share significant holidays with his children. Furthermore, the responsibility for picking up the children falls on the receiving parent, placing an unequal burden on Aaron.
The court has imposed certain restrictions on Aaron, including a rule that requires him to remain one city block away from Sirinya’s home, school, or work, and limiting communication between the parents to “My Family Wizard”. These restrictions could be viewed as unjust and might infringe on Aaron’s right to maintain a regular and healthy relationship with his children.
The court order could be signed without Aaron’s knowledge or input, suggesting a potential oversight of his rights as a parent. Furthermore, the document refers to “Reasons for putting limitations on a parent” but does not specify these reasons or indicate whether Aaron was given an opportunity to address these concerns, raising questions about due process and fairness.
In conclusion, the proposed parenting plan appears to favor Sirinya and presents several areas of potential unfairness and bias against Aaron Surina. Concerns are raised about potential judicial bias, lack of impartial review, and unethical conduct, which combined, might indicate an infringement upon Aaron’s rights as a parent.
About The Author
