Document: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/365.0 PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS 2020-03-11 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-03-11
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Combined Summary:
The court documents appear to reflect bias and potential unfairness against Mr. Aaron Surina, with significant financial penalties and penal actions imposed on him that raise concerns about the equity of the proceedings.
Despite a court order to sell the family residence, Mr. Surina was unfairly penalized for not accepting a purchase offer contingent on a roof replacement, which could have diminished the property’s value and increased his financial burden. Additionally, allegations of Mr. Surina’s refusal to provide mortgage lender documentation do not take into account possible misunderstandings or miscommunications that may have impeded his compliance.
Further, the court imposed a considerable financial obligation on Mr. Surina, including a civil penalty of $500, attorney fees and costs totaling $1,500, and a judgment for the estimated repair cost of $22,513.01. The justification for holding Mr. Surina solely responsible for these costs remains unclear.
Moreover, the court found Mr. Surina in contempt and sentenced him to an unspecified jail term, seemingly based on his refusal to authorize insurance claims. This severe punishment could be perceived as an overreach or misuse of judicial power, particularly if Mr. Surina had valid reasons for his refusal.
The court’s “correction” offer for the contempt — immediate authorization of the insurance claim and payment of the judgments for attorney fees and penalty — may be construed as coercive and unjust.
Overall, the court’s decisions and actions appear heavily skewed against Mr. Surina, indicating possible unfairness or unethical conduct. However, a comprehensive review of the complete court document is necessary to provide an accurate, father-favorable summary highlighting any potential injustices or bias.
About The Author
