Document: LETTER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/366.0 LETTER 2020-03-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-03-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the perspective of Aaron Surina, this court document could suggest possible unfairness and bias. The abrupt recusal of the presiding judge, Michael P. Price, from the case raises questions about the reasoning behind this action. The removal of the scheduled hearing date on 3/13/2020 without immediate rescheduling could be seen as an inconvenient delay that potentially prolongs the resolution of the case, resulting in undue stress and potential financial burden for Mr. Surina. Furthermore, the lack of clear communication about the reasons for these changes and the process of reassigning to another judicial officer might be seen as a lack of transparency, which could be construed as unethical conduct. The document does not provide sufficient information for the father to fully understand his position, which could be interpreted as a form of bias against him.
About The Author
