Document: ORDER FOR INTERPRETER & MOTION
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/37.0 ORDER FOR INTERPRETER & MOTION 2017-09-18 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-09-18
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents suggest an unfair or biased handling of the case against Aaron Surina. The order for an interpreter at the county’s expense seems advantageous for Sirivya Purina, Aaron’s counterpart, without taking into account Aaron’s financial situation or ability to pay for an interpreter himself. Furthermore, the court has planned to provide the interpreter from the Superior Court Administrator’s office, which may lead to questions about impartiality. The interpreter’s role is stated as translating only what is said in court, not deciphering or explaining. However, there are concerns about the potential for translation bias, which could disadvantage Aaron. As such, these documents could be seen as reflecting unfairness or unethical conduct against Aaron.
About The Author
