Document: PETITION FOR ORDER FOR PROTECTION
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/371.0 PETITION FOR ORDER FOR PROTECTION 2020-03-31 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-03-31
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Unified Summary:
The court documents pertain to a Petition for Order for Protection filed against Aaron Surina, alleging domestic violence without providing substantial evidence. The petitioner’s one-sided narratives and demands, such as sole possession of personal belongings, use of a specific vehicle, custody of the children, and an order restraining Aaron from physical contact or proximity, can be seen as an infringement on Aaron’s rights as a parent and individual. These claims lack substantial context or detail, painting Aaron in an unnecessarily negative light and indicating possible bias against him.
The petitioner’s demands for Aaron to vacate their shared residence and surrender his firearms, coupled with requests for him to pay the costs of the action, participate in treatment services, and refrain from leaving the state with the children, could be perceived as attempts to financially and personally burden Aaron. The vague reference to an event on March 20, 2020, without further context or details, may constitute an assumption of guilt without a fair trial.
Furthermore, the lack of clarity in these documents regarding allegations of violence, threats, stalking behavior, and firearm use seems to hinder Aaron’s ability to understand the charges and defend himself effectively, infringing on his right to a fair trial. Leading questions about firearms and potentially prejudicial insinuations about Aaron’s eligibility to possess one, without proper investigation or evidence, may also harm his reputation and rights.
The inclusion of a Child Custody Information Sheet implies a threat to Aaron’s custody rights or access to his children. This is compounded by the court’s jurisdiction determination process, which seems to assume abandonment or abuse based on unproven allegations, further suggesting potential bias and an infringement on Aaron’s parental rights.
Overall, the documents appear to favor the petitioner, presuming Aaron’s guilt and misconduct without providing him a fair chance to defend himself. From Aaron’s perspective, these proceedings reflect potential bias, unfairness, and possible infringement on his rights, indicating a need for his side of the story to be adequately presented and considered to uphold the principles of fairness and justice.
About The Author
