Document: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/374.0 AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER 2020-05-15 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-05-15
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents reveal an apparent unfairness towards Aaron Surina, the respondent in the case. His ex-wife, Sirinya Surina, submitted an affidavit with a revised Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) following the rejection of the original order by Fidelity Investments. The original QDRO was signed by Judge Price on December 20, 2019, but was deemed inadequate by Fidelity.
This situation can be seen as unjust from Aaron’s perspective, especially if he was not adequately consulted or given the opportunity to provide input in the revised QDRO. It seems that Sirinya unilaterally created the new QDRO using Fidelity’s website, which could create a bias in her favor and undermine the fairness of the process.
Furthermore, Sirinya’s request to appear by telephone due to her inability to afford an attorney could be seen as an attempt to garner sympathy from the court, which could potentially influence the court’s decision-making process. This could be seen as an example of unethical conduct if her request was made with the intent to manipulate the court’s perception.
In conclusion, these documents suggest that Aaron Surina may be subject to unfair treatment and potential bias in the handling of his case. The unilateral creation of a new QDRO might have disregarded his rights as an involved party, and Sirinya’s request to appear by telephone may potentially be a strategic move to sway the court’s sympathy in her favor.