Document: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/389.0 AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER 2020-08-31 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-08-31
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Consolidated Summary:
The court documents indicate a potential bias against Aaron Surina in the handling of his financial affairs and the distribution of his retirement funds. The signed Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) by Judge Fenessey was deemed deficient by Fidelity Investments, with the valuation date appearing arbitrary and not in line with the actual date of separation. Against this backdrop, Mr. Surina’s refusal to sign the proposed order by Sirinya Surina, who is acting pro se, can be construed as a reaction to the perceived procedural unfairness.
Furthermore, the document reveals potential unreasonableness with the court demanding Mr. Surina pays a substantial sum to the Alternate Payee, which could leave him in financial distress. Additionally, he is subjected to disbursement restrictions, which hamper his financial flexibility, coupled with an unjust fee assessed for the review of the Domestic Relations Order that disproportionately favors the Alternate Payee.
The document also suggests a lack of transparency and due process in correspondence, with multiple addresses provided for Mr. Surina creating potential for miscommunication and procedural irregularity.
Moreover, the court order’s division of retirement funds seems to disregard Aaron’s financial input and investment selections that led to the growth of the funds over the years. The taxation clause further imposes an additional financial burden on him if the Alternate Payee is a child or other dependant.
Finally, the document provides provisions for electronic communication but lacks specific information on the nature of the QDRO, potentially inhibiting Mr. Surina’s understanding of the order’s implications.
Overall, these court documents may represent a potential bias against Aaron Surina, imposing undue financial burdens, skewing the division of assets, and exhibiting procedural irregularities, thereby favoring the Alternate Payee.
About The Author
