Document: ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/39.0 ORDER OF CONTINUANCE 2017-09-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-09-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In the case of Sirinya Surina and Aaron Michael Surina, documented in the “Order of Continuance,” there are numerous instances of potential bias and unfairness against Aaron Surina that deserve attention. The document reveals that Sirinya, as the petitioner, was granted a continuance, which can be interpreted as an unfair procedural bias as it delays the court proceedings and infringes on Aaron’s right to a timely trial.
Moreover, the court order heavily favors Sirinya concerning residential time with their children, David and Andrew. The children are primarily to reside with Sirinya, denying Aaron equal time with them. This unequal distribution could be viewed as an unjust bias against Aaron, especially given the absence of any evidence or reasons justifying this decision.
The court order also imposes restrictions on Aaron, notably the prohibition on consuming alcohol or marijuana 24 hours prior to and during visitation. Comparable restrictions on Sirinya are missing from the order, suggesting an unfair double standard.
In addition to these injustices, the order maintains previous court-imposed restraints on Aaron, including unspecified sections 7 and 10. The lack of transparency regarding these sections raises questions about whether these restraints are justly applied to Aaron.
However, the document’s text does not provide sufficient context or details to fully explore any potential unethical conduct by the attorneys involved, including Stanley Kempner or Keith Glanzer, or any unfairness against Aaron Surina. Given the high stakes involving the welfare of two children, every aspect of the case deserves thorough examination to ensure fair treatment for all parties involved, especially Aaron, who has demonstrated a persistent effort to protect his children.
About The Author
