Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/391.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2020-09-04 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-09-04
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court proceedings for the case, Surina, Sirinya A vs Surina, Aaron M, case number 17-3-01817-0, seem to have instances of bias and unfair treatment against Aaron Surina. Firstly, the court document does not provide any specific details of the arguments presented by the respective parties, making it difficult to ascertain whether Aaron’s points were duly considered. This lack of transparency raises questions about the fairness of the hearing.
Furthermore, there is a conspicuous absence of any signed statement or decision from the court, stated as “***NOTHING AT THIS TIME***”. This raises concerns about the court’s commitment to a timely and just resolution for Aaron. The court’s decision, as indicated ‘on the record’, is also not shared in the document, further fueling suspicions of opacity and bias.
The presence of a Thai language interpreter may suggest that language barriers could have potentially affected Aaron’s understanding of the proceedings or his ability to adequately present his case, especially if he is not fluent in Thai.
Overall, the document reflects a possible lack of fairness and transparency in the court proceedings, which could have disadvantaged Aaron in his case. Without detailed information on the arguments and the court’s rationale for its decisions, it is difficult to determine whether Aaron received a fair hearing.
About The Author
