Document: ORDER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/393.0 ORDER 2020-09-10 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-09-10
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents reveal potential bias and unfairness against Mr. Aaron Surina, in the order related to his request for an amendment to the final orders that were issued on December 20, 2019. Despite Mr. Surina’s proactive efforts to rectify the situation by representing himself and putting forth his arguments, the court dismissed his motion without providing a justified basis for the denial.
It is notable that the court did not elaborate on why Mr. Surina “failed to establish a basis for an amendment to the Final Orders,” which suggests a lack of transparency, potentially favoring the plaintiff, Siriny Surina. The court’s denial of Mr. Surina’s motion without a detailed explanation may indicate a disregard for his rights and a denial of a fair chance to present his case.
Furthermore, the court’s reliance on the final orders that reflect Judge Price’s oral ruling made on November 27, 2019, without assessing its fairness or accuracy, might imply a possible bias. The court’s order does not explain why the final orders should remain unamended, further raising questions about the fairness and impartiality of the court’s decision-making process.
In conclusion, the court’s ruling, from Mr. Surina’s perspective, appears to be biased and unjust, as it denies him the opportunity to amend final orders without providing a comprehensive explanation or considering his arguments.
About The Author
