Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/40.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2017-09-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-09-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court document provided is largely incomplete and contains no clear specific details about the proceedings or decisions made in the course of the trial. However, from a father’s perspective, it can be inferred that there might be potential issues of bias or unfairness in the following areas:
1. Representation: The document indicates that the Plaintiff/Petitioner was represented by Counsel but it doesn’t clearly state whether Aaron Surina, the Respondent/Defendant, was present or had any legal representation. This may suggest unequal representation or lack of fair opportunity to defend himself.
2. Incomplete Documentation: The document is not filled out properly and is missing critical information. This could indicate negligence or a lack of thoroughness in recording the proceedings from the court, which potentially undermines Aaron’s right to a fair trial.
3. Transparency: Without clear and specific details about the proceedings or decisions made, it’s difficult to ascertain whether the process was carried out in a fair, unbiased manner. This lack of transparency could potentially conceal improper conduct or biases against Aaron.
It’s important to note that these are potential issues inferred from the limited information provided. Further details are needed to confirm any unjust treatment or prejudice against Aaron Surina in the course of the trial.
About The Author
