Document: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/413.0 AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER 2020-11-02 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-11-02
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents suggest a series of potential biases and procedural errors against Aaron Surina, with possible implications on his rights, financial stability, and privacy.
The document reveals that Sirinya Surina, Aaron’s ex-spouse, completed the Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) without his apparent involvement. This order, which could significantly affect Aaron’s retirement funds, was completed on a public website, seemingly disregarding Aaron’s right to participation. Furthermore, it appears that both parties may not have equal legal knowledge or representation, potentially tipping the balance against Aaron. The court’s seeming failure to address this issue raises concerns about Aaron’s rights being adequately protected.
There are also issues with the details of the QDRO. The Valuation Date for calculating the alternate payee’s award seems arbitrary, potentially leading to an unfair division of assets. Additionally, the distribution of assets, tax implications, procedures following the death of the alternate payee, and potential privacy concerns related to electronic communications all appear to favor the alternate payee, threatening Aaron’s financial stability and privacy.
Moreover, there’s an apparent procedural error in the document that inaccurately identifies Aaron’s health plan. This mistake, combined with the apparent entry of the QDRO into court record without considering Aaron’s objections or disagreements, raises questions about possible judicial bias and unethical conduct.
While there’s no clear indication of unfair treatment, the document does suggest potential areas of concern that may disadvantage Aaron. Comprehensive access to all relevant court documents is necessary to fully determine the presence of bias or unfairness. However, the aforementioned issues raise significant concerns about the fairness of the legal proceedings and the protection of Aaron Surina’s rights.
About The Author
