Document: DECLARATION OF SRIRATTANAKUN,
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/42.0 DECLARATION OF SRIRATTANAKUN, 2017-09-25 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-09-25
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Combined Summary:
In the declaration of Benjamas Srirattanakun, a clear bias against Aaron Surina is demonstrated throughout the court proceedings of a divorce case. The documents, consisting primarily of accusations made by Srirattanakun, the mother of petitioner Sirinya Surina, paint a consistently negative image of Aaron without offering him an opportunity to defend himself or present his version of events.
The allegations against Aaron range from verbal abuse, creating daily arguments, intentionally causing disturbances, to neglecting his duties as a father. Srirattanakun also alleges Aaron of confinement and financial control over Sirinya, preventing her from leaving the house or accessing their bank account. These grave accusations, if true, represent unethical conduct. However, the one-sided presentation of these charges, without proper evidence or a chance for Aaron to respond, potentially biases the proceedings against him.
Furthermore, assertions of Aaron’s bad temper, alcohol and marijuana use, and failure to take prescribed medication could significantly damage his character. Yet, without a fair chance for Aaron to address these claims or provide medical record evidence, it is unjust to accept them outright.
Srirattanakun also targets Aaron’s relationship with his children, David and Andrew, alleging that he caused fear in David and prevented Sirinya from taking the children outside. These statements, presented without concrete evidence or firsthand accounts, suggest a prejudiced perspective. Additionally, Srirattanakun’s irrelevant claim of Aaron forcing her out of a bedroom and interfering with her daily activities seems to be more of a personal grudge than pertinent information to the children’s welfare.
The serious accusation of Srirattanakun wanting Aaron not to “abuse and hurt” the children all their life is presented without any supporting evidence, further indicating an attempt to unfairly tarnish Aaron’s character.
Overall, the court documents and Srirattanakun’s declaration appear to unfairly favor one side, lacking any positive or neutral comments about Aaron and substantial evidence to back the accusations. This lack of balance and potential injustice in the representation of facts indicates an unethical conduct by attorneys, particularly Stanley Kempner and Keith Glanzer, and serves to further bias the proceedings against Aaron Surina.
About The Author
