Document: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/446.0 AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER 2020-12-15 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-12-15
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In the AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER, Aaron Surina articulates deep-seated grievances against what he perceives as a biased and unfair legal system. He contends that his ex-spouse, Sirinya Surina, along with attorneys Stanley Kempner, Keith Glanzer, and others, have manipulated the court proceedings to disadvantage him, specifically in the handling of their children’s custody and child support payments.
Aaron argues that Sirinya’s accusations lack concrete evidence, a tactic he believes is aimed at tarnishing his image before the court. He also accuses her of downplaying the economic struggles he has faced due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and unfairly suggesting that he should tap into his retirement funds to cover child support. Aaron decries the direct service of court documents, questioning the impartiality of the process and whether he was given adequate time to respond to the serious allegations and requests served.
The documents also outline a litany of orders served against Aaron, including a Temporary Protection Order, Notice of Hearing, and Motion of Contempt Hearing. He questions the justification and explanation for these orders, and whether he was given an opportunity to defend himself, especially given the implications for his religious beliefs and rights.
Aaron contends that his status as a free sovereign natural born citizen, as per historical documents like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 and the original Idaho constitution, is not being respected. He suggests that his Social Security Number was forced upon him and that he is being held accountable to a corporate entity or document that he does not recognize.
He further alleges that his consent was forcibly obtained for the original Social Security application while he was a minor, constituting constructive fraud. He also disputes any erroneous presumptions of U.S. residence established through prior IRS forms and rejects any agreement with the U.S. government that may have altered his natural unalienable God-given rights.
Aaron asserts that his rights have been violated through fraudulent withholding of material facts, and he insists that he has never willingly relinquished his constitutionally secured rights. He believes that he is being compelled to perform under contracts he did not voluntarily enter and that government agencies are bound by the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, which should provide him with a remedy.
Lastly, Aaron reserves his right to amend his affidavit as new facts emerge, particularly relating to what he perceives as ‘massive fiscal fraud’. He is seeking responses from any agencies that believe they have jurisdictional authority over him. He also requests that any claims in his Nunc Pro Tunc Affidavit that are properly rebutted by law or Supreme Court ruling should not prejudice the validity of his other claims.
Overall, the document reveals Aaron Surina’s perception of an unjust legal system laden with potential biases and unethical conduct, particularly by opposing attorneys and his ex-spouse. It underscores his persistent attempts to safeguard his rights and ensure fair treatment within the legal proceedings.
About The Author
