Document: PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/45.0 PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN 2017-09-25 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-09-25
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Combined Summary:
The proposed parenting plan, submitted by Siriniya Surina, appears to be unfairly biased against Aaron Surina, potentially infringing on his parental rights and imposing undue burdens. Despite making vague allegations of domestic violence, the plan fails to provide concrete evidence or instances to substantiate these claims. This lack of evidence, coupled with the plan’s paradoxical expectation of Aaron’s full participation in decision-making for their children’s wellbeing, could be perceived as an attempt to tarnish Aaron’s reputation while exploiting his parental responsibilities.
The plan allocates custody and parenting time in a manner that seemingly favors Siriniya, designating her as the sole custodian and granting Aaron limited time with his children. This allocation, along with the imposition of an age-appropriate parenting class for Aaron, indirectly questions his parenting skills and could be seen as an unjust condition.
Moreover, the plan’s relocation and scheduling provisions could potentially disadvantage Aaron. The custodian is permitted to move the children to different school districts with minimal notice, potentially disrupting Aaron’s established visitation schedule. Additionally, the holiday schedule, summer schedule, and pick-up arrangements appear to favor the custodian, potentially limiting Aaron’s quality time with his children.
Furthermore, the dispute resolution process could financially exploit Aaron, as the cost of mediation, arbitration, or counseling services is determined by each parent’s Proportional Share of Income. The plan also imposes stringent conditions and timelines on Aaron, particularly regarding parental relocation and objecting to proposed changes.
Taken as a whole, the plan appears to favor Siriniya Surina, potentially causing an injustice and displaying bias against Aaron. As such, further investigation is required to ensure Aaron’s rights are upheld, and any potential unethical conduct or judicial bias is addressed.
About The Author
