Document: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/457.0 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2021-02-16 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2021-02-16
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
In a comprehensive review of the court document, it is apparent that Aaron Surina, the respondent, is experiencing a series of injustices and unethical conduct regarding his parental rights and the enforcement of his parenting plan. His ex-partner, Sirinya Polarj, has allegedly violated the court-ordered parenting plan on several occasions, demonstrating a complete disregard for the legal agreement and Mr. Surina’s parental rights.
Specifically, Ms. Polarj is accused of intentionally interfering with Mr. Surina’s scheduled school pick-up of their child, DMS, creating conflict at the child’s school. This blatant violation occurred despite the plan clearly stating that Mr. Surina is to pick up DMS from school on his assigned Thursdays. Ms. Polarj’s actions, which included showing up at the school, yelling at Mr. Surina, and taking DMS herself, show an utter disrespect for the legal system and an unjust attempt to undermine Mr. Surina’s parental rights.
In addition to this violation, Ms. Polarj has reportedly spoken negatively about Mr. Surina in front of their children, a clear transgression of the court orders. This unethical conduct potentially harms the children’s psychological well-being and their relationship with their father. Furthermore, Ms. Polarj has been accused of withholding Mr. Surina’s two sons and delaying their pick-up beyond the permitted five-minute window outlined in the court’s order. This continued non-compliance demonstrates a biased and unfair treatment against Mr. Surina, undermining his ability to exercise his parental rights.
Aaron Surina’s concerns extend beyond his own rights, as he has shown through his explicit worry about the undue stress being caused to his son David, potentially exacerbating his asthma. His request for the other party to take an adult adolescent parenting skill examination further suggests that he believes the current situation is not in the best interest of his children. Despite his earnest attempts to ensure the well-being of his children, it appears that his concerns and requests are not being adequately addressed by the court, indicating potential bias and discriminatory practices.
Aaron has also sought a monetary judgment for the violation of the parenting plan, but the court’s response to this request remains unclear. This lack of response may indicate a further bias or lack of fairness in the court’s handling of the case.
In his messages, Aaron expresses frustration about being portrayed negatively at his children’s school by Sirinya, suggesting an attempt to damage his relationship with his children. He criticizes Sirinya’s ‘winner-take-all’ attitude, accusing her of using their children as pawns in their disputes, an unethical conduct.
Aaron’s attempts at communication with his children and third parties have not been viewed, suggesting a potential limit to his ability to express his perspective and advocate for his rights as a father. His request for a court evaluation underscores his belief in biases and injustices in the current handling of their case.
In conclusion, Aaron Surina is facing challenges in the enforcement and respect of his rights as a father. His attempts to ensure the well-being of his children seem to be overlooked by the court, potentially indicating discriminatory practices or bias against him. This suggests a need for a fair and impartial review of the situation for the best interest of their children.
About The Author
