Document: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/459.0 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2021-02-16 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2021-02-16
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Final Summary:
The court documents reveal a pattern of unjust treatment and potential bias against Aaron Surina in his quest to uphold his custodial rights to his children. Mr. Surina’s ex-partner, Sirinya Polarj, consistently violated the court-ordered residential schedule by denying him his rightful access to his children and concealing their whereabouts during his scheduled time.
Notable instances of this misconduct occurred on December 17 and 18, 2020, when Polarj intentionally withheld the children and violated the parenting plan and the RCW 9A.40.060 law. Furthermore, Polarj seems to engage in behavior that inflicts psychological harm on the children by misleading them into believing that their father does not want to see them. This conduct is detrimental to Surina’s relationship with his children, potentially infringing on his parental rights, and highlighting the need for further legal actions to rectify these injustices.
In addition to this, a concerning restraining order is in place, preventing the children from reaching out to family members or emergency services in unsafe situations. This restriction not only seems to be against the children’s best interests but also constitutes an unjust measure against Mr. Surina, further limiting his ability to ensure his children’s safety and wellbeing.
Despite Surina’s attempts to communicate and schedule pickups for his children, he is met with silence or unclear responses from Polarj. The communication logs from the OurFamilyWizard website demonstrate Surina’s struggle to exercise his parental rights due to this lack of cooperation, hinting at potential unethical conduct on Polarj’s part.
These documents collectively suggest a system that fails to protect Surina’s rights as a father and uphold the fair execution of the court-ordered parenting schedule. They also imply a degree of bias and potential unethical conduct within the court and Polarj’s actions, undermining Surina’s relationship with his children and potentially constituting a form of parental alienation.
Aaron Surina’s pleas for acknowledgment of these repeated violations of the law and the parenting plan illustrate a sense of injustice and potential bias against him. The documents appear to reflect an unjust situation where Surina’s rights as a father are being compromised, raising questions about the fairness of the system if these instances are not taken into account in the custody arrangement or decision-making process.
About The Author
