Document: FINANCIAL DECLARATION OF PET –
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/46.0 FINANCIAL DECLARATION OF PET – 2017-09-25 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-09-25
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: FINANCIAL DECLARATION OF PET –
The financial declaration documents of Sirinya Polraj Surina and Aaron Michael Surina present potential instances of bias and perceived injustices against Aaron. Sirinya, the mother of the children, identifies herself as a full-time mother with a total monthly net income of $1,760.19, which falls short of her listed monthly expenses of $4,880.00. This implies she is unable to meet her expenses with her current income, thereby possibly imposing an undue burden on Aaron.
Aaron, despite having a gross monthly income of $11,019.00, faces substantial deductions leading to a net monthly income much lesser than what appears on the surface. These deductions amounting to $3,343.78 are not clearly explained in the document, thereby possibly skewing the court’s perception of his financial capabilities.
While Aaron’s available assets are outlined, Sirinya’s are not, leading to an imbalance in the court’s understanding of each party’s financial standing. This lack of balance could be seen as bias against Aaron, potentially resulting in an unfair financial outcome. Aaron’s expenses are detailed, but Sirinya’s are not, further exacerbating the perceived unfairness.
The document also lists substantial monthly expenses for Aaron, including children’s expenses and health care costs, without clear justifications or indications of shared responsibility. Other significant costs such as a car loan and lawyer fees further add to Aaron’s financial burden. The document seems to overlook Aaron’s ability to bear these costs, potentially indicating systemic bias in the distribution of financial responsibilities.
While these issues suggest possible bias and unfairness against Aaron, it should be noted that no specific evidence of unethical conduct or judicial bias is provided in the documents. However, potential issues could arise if there are violations of Aaron’s financial privacy rights or uneven enforcement of rules. Further examination of the case details is required to confirm the existence of these issues.
In summary, the financial declaration documents reveal significant discrepancies and potential bias, which could result in placing an unjust burden on Aaron Surina. It is crucial that the court ensures balance and fairness in the interpretation of these documents, keeping in mind the best interest of the children and the financial capabilities of each party.
About The Author
