Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/463.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2021-02-25 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2021-02-25
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In a comprehensive review of the court documents pertaining to a custodial dispute, a series of perceived injustices and unethical conduct against Aaron Surina have been identified. Mr. Surina alleges that Sirinya Polar, the mother of his children, has intentionally omitted context from the court’s orders regarding their parenting plan. He asserts that Sirinya has consistently violated the law and court orders, creating unnecessary conflict and serving false pleadings.
Aaron also contends that Sirinya, her mother, and her “advisor” unethically withheld his two sons in violation of the court’s order, constituting custodial interference. This, he believes, infringes on his rights as a father.
Furthermore, Mr. Surina perceives bias in the court’s decisions, which he believes inherently favor the mother. The children predominantly live with Sirinya, and she has sole decision-making authority, including schooling choices. The court also requires Mr. Surina to provide all transportation for visitation exchanges, which he believes places an undue burden on him. The court’s reluctance to consider a shared plan, despite his willingness, further indicates a perceived bias.
Additionally, a significant change in the visitation schedule was imposed without Mr. Surina’s full agreement. His Wednesday visits were abruptly discontinued, with vague promises of compensation. The court also limits communication between Mr. Surina and his ex-partner, and mandates curbside exchanges of the children, which he perceives as impersonal.
Finally, Mr. Surina’s financial concerns were dismissed by the court, which did not address his struggles with mortgage payments resulting from financial orders. The court’s claim that the ruling is “extraordinarily slanted” in Mr. Surina’s favor contradicts his experiences and perceptions, raising questions about the fairness of the process and the court’s impartiality.
Overall, the court documents suggest potential injustices against Mr. Surina, who believes his rights as a father have been repeatedly violated. He seeks the court’s intervention to protect his children and himself from continued false allegations, disparaging comments, and harassment.
About The Author
