Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/471.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2023-06-07 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-06-07
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
The document extensively highlights the trials and tribulations of Aaron Surina, the respondent and father, who has been diligently following all court orders, including prompt child support payments. Despite his unwavering adherence, he has been subjected to numerous injustices.
These injustices stem primarily from the petitioner, Sirinya Surina, who has repeatedly demonstrated disregard for the well-being of their children. Incidents of exposing the children to inappropriate environments, such as her workplace, a bar, raise serious concerns over the children’s welfare. Additionally, her refusal to prioritize the children’s education, including declining to allocate time for recommended tutoring, disrupts their educational continuity and potentially hampers their growth.
Sirinya’s relocation without prior discussion or notification to Aaron further disrupts the children’s support network and educational environment. Moreover, her failure to involve Aaron in crucial decisions regarding the children’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) and withholding crucial information about their eldest son’s performance severely undermines Aaron’s parental rights and the best interests of the children.
The document also points to potential bias against Aaron Surina in the approved parenting plan. Sirinya’s refusal to allow any additional time outside the court-approved plan essentially restricts Aaron’s ability to fully contribute to the children’s overall development.
Concerns are also raised about Sirinya’s potential alcoholism, given her association with an establishment known for excessive alcohol consumption. Despite these concerns, the court’s apparent lack of adequate evaluation of her fitness as a parent could endanger the children’s safety and well-being.
Despite these numerous challenges, Aaron Surina continues to demonstrate his ability to provide a stable, loving, and nurturing environment for his children. His commitment to their welfare is evidenced by his consistent employment and adherence to court orders. Yet, his humble request for a change of custody, which he believes to be in the children’s best interest, appears to be overlooked by the court, hinting at a potential unfair bias against him in the court proceedings.
In conclusion, the document paints a bleak picture of the systemic injustices and potential unethical conduct by the attorneys representing Sirinya Surina, Carl Wilson, and Keith Glanzer, which have significantly hampered Aaron Surina’s efforts to protect his children.
About The Author
