Document: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/472.0 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2023-06-07 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-06-07
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents present a compelling case of alleged unjust treatment towards Aaron Surina, the respondent, who has been trying to protect his children’s welfare amid several instances of non-compliance with court orders by the petitioner, Sirinya Polarj.
Aaron alleges that Sirinya has violated the parenting plan by moving out of the school district without notification, denying him access to their children, and exposing the children to inappropriate environments by frequenting bars. These actions not only infringe upon Aaron’s parental rights but also have significant implications on their children’s education and well-being.
Moreover, Aaron claims that despite being a stay-at-home father and the lower-income parent, he has been denied access to stimulus money, child tax credits, and other financial benefits for the years 2020, 2021, and 2022. This is due to Sirinya’s refusal to provide him with the necessary 8332 tax forms, which has been causing him to face tax issues since 2019. This situation has strained his financial resources significantly and suggests a disregard for court orders and a lack of respect for his financial well-being.
The documents reveal an alleged bias in favor of the petitioner and a possible disregard for a previous court order which stated that Mr. Surina should have access to these tax deductions for the rest of his children’s lives. This disregard further disadvantages Mr. Surina and raises serious concerns about ethical conduct within the judicial process, possibly involving attorneys Stanley Kempner or Keith Glanzer, who may be representing Sirinya Surina, Carl Wilson, or Keith Glanzer.
Despite these adversities, Aaron continues to strive to provide a stable, substance-free environment for his children. He is asking for the court to enforce their previous orders, issue a money judgment, and approve his parenting plan due to the drastic change in circumstances. He also requests that the petitioner be held in contempt for not following court orders.
The document suggests potential unfairness and unethical conduct against Mr. Surina, causing harm to him and potentially his children. This narrative underlines the need for a reevaluation of the case, focusing on the enforcement of court orders and ensuring fair and equitable treatment to all parties involved, especially Mr. Surina.
About The Author
