Document: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/477.0 PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS 2023-06-08 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-06-08
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Final Summary:
The court documents relating to Aaron Surina’s case reveal a potential bias against him in the handling of his child support obligations and the calculation of income. The documents lack specific details about Mr. Surina’s situation, making it difficult to gauge the fairness of the court’s decisions. The ambiguities found in the documents and lack of transparency in the decision-making process may suggest bias or unethical conduct against Mr. Surina.
The court is seen to be making assumptions about Mr. Surina’s income without clear evidence, potentially leading to an unjust financial burden on him. Additionally, it’s not clarified how various income limits and deviations from standard child support calculations apply to his case. The document’s impersonal approach, lack of personalized information, and potential misrepresentation of Mr. Surina’s financial situation could be seen as an injustice against him.
Moreover, the document insinuates that Mr. Surina may be unfairly burdened with the child’s post-secondary education expenses and tax exemptions without clear justification. The documents also suggest that he may face undue strain due to calculations for child support payments without clear consideration of all factors in his situation. Provisions allowing for arbitrary adjustments to the order without showing substantial change of circumstances could potentially be unfavorable to Mr. Surina.
Furthermore, Mr. Surina faces potentially unfair conditions in making payments and the enforcement of collections without notice. The possibility of income withholding unless a good reason is proven, and the potential for sudden increases in child support payment post-incarceration, add to the perceived injustices.
Lastly, the documents impose potentially disproportionate financial responsibilities on Mr. Surina regarding healthcare coverage and children’s expenses without providing clear measures or rationale for these decisions. This lack of transparency, coupled with potentially high interest rates and decisions being made without his knowledge, could be seen as signs of bias and unethical conduct against Aaron Surina.
In summary, the court documents point to potential injustices, lack of fairness, and possible bias or unethical conduct against Aaron Surina in handling his child support obligations and determining his financial responsibilities.
About The Author
