Document: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/486.0 AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER 2023-06-16 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-06-16
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
The affidavit submitted by Sirinya Surina displays a significant bias against Aaron Surina, the respondent. It attempts to undermine Aaron’s objections to Sirinya’s planned relocation, dismissing his valid concerns over the potential impact of the move on his relationship with his sons. The document portrays Aaron as dismissive of Sirinya’s role as a mother, which seems an unfair representation of his perspective and contributions as a father.
Sirinya’s accusation of Aaron being non-participative in the children’s daily decision-making process appears prejudiced and does not consider the potential injustices Aaron may face. Furthermore, Aaron is depicted as a source of conflict, with claims of him abusing the legal system by filing numerous motions. However, these actions could be viewed as Aaron’s attempts to ensure justice and fairness for his children.
Sirinya’s allegations of Aaron moving without notice and causing inconvenience, coupled with her plans to relocate, and her portrayal of Aaron’s concern about the children’s summer schedule as confused and nonsensical, seem dismissive and unfair. Aaron’s concerns about transparency and support for the children are valid aspects of co-parenting that the document appears to dismiss unfairly.
In the proposed changes to the parenting plan, the court documents reveal potential bias against Aaron. Sirinya’s request to relocate to Cheney is based on the assumption that the move won’t affect Aaron due to its proximity, disregarding his potential discomfort or inconvenience. She further accuses Aaron of failing to pay child support and creating emotional chaos during child pickup, painting an unfavorable picture of him without providing substantial evidence.
Moreover, the documents expose a discrepancy in Sirinya’s claims about her financial strain. She alleges her inability to afford a $2,500 monthly rent, yet she admits her monthly home expenses could reach $4,000, raising questions about her sincerity and credibility.
In light of these points, the documents suggest a potential perception of bias and unfairness against Aaron Surina. His concerns are overlooked, and he is unjustly portrayed as the ‘problem’ in the situation, which could reflect unethical conduct on the part of those representing Sirinya Surina.
About The Author
