Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/495.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2023-07-03 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-07-03
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Aaron Surina, the noncustodial father, has raised serious concerns regarding potential bias and unfair actions in his court case against Sirinya Surina, with primary focus on the welfare of their children, David and Andrew.
The first point of contention is the alleged disregard for the court’s ruling on child relocation. Despite the court’s denial of Sirinya’s planned move, Aaron notes that she has continued to pursue it, which he believes compromises the best interest of the children. The father has called for a temporary halt on the relocation until a thorough hearing can take place.
Aaron also emphasizes the disruption that the move would cause to the children’s stable environment, affecting their schooling and social relationships. More importantly, he has highlighted the children’s expressed desire to live with him, an indication of their preference for stability, which he feels is being undermined.
Aaron has further accused Sirinya of noncompliance with court orders, particularly those requiring her to provide essential financial documents necessary for his tax resolution. This alleged pattern of disobedience, coupled with Sirinya’s lack of financial transparency, is seen by Aaron as obstructing a fair resolution of their case.
The father also criticizes Sirinya for prioritizing her financial interests over the welfare of their children, attempting to absolve herself of any financial obligation towards their upbringing. This is compounded by her alleged misrepresentation of her availability to care for the children due to her business commitments, which Aaron plans to challenge in court.
Further complicating matters, Aaron raises concerns about a potential restraining order that would limit the children’s contact with family members, and an alarming accusation about Sirinya’s mother, implying potential danger to the children.
In light of these issues, Aaron Surina is seeking immediate intervention from the court to address these matters. He contends that the court documents reflect a bias against him and an unfair disregard for the children’s best interests. His primary objective is to ensure a fair and just resolution that prioritizes the children’s welfare and rights.
About The Author
