Document: STATUS REPORT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/50.0 STATUS REPORT 2017-09-27 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-09-27
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents reflect a potential bias against father, Aaron Surina, in the ongoing case of “In re the Marriage of Surina”. The motion hearing was filed on August 14, 2017, and it mainly involved Temporary Orders and objections to late filed declarations. There seems to be a considerable disparity in the volume of declarations that were filed by both parties.
On the side of the petitioner, Sirinya Surina, there are multiple declarations, including her own on August 14 and September 25, as well as from Carl Wilson, Benjamas Srirattanakun, and Bang-orn Wilson. The total volume of the petitioner’s side is 20.5 pages. The petitioner also attached an Amended Financial Declaration and a Proposed Parenting Plan on September 25, 2017.
On the other hand, the respondent, Aaron Surina, submitted a Declaration with Exhibits totaling 16 pages. There were also declarations from Christine Surina, Donna Radcliff, Chuck Karschney, Annette Sanburn, Alyssa Surina, Billie Gipner, Jesiah Metzker, Karmen Colby, and Zachary Tovrea. However, these declarations total to just 8.5 pages.
The disparity in the volume of declarations might indicate a bias in the handling of this case, as more weight seems to be given to the petitioner’s side. Additionally, the late filing of declarations by Sirinya Surina may be seen as an unethical conduct, possibly aimed at preventing a fair and timely response from Aaron Surina. Overall, these documents may suggest unfairness and potential bias against the father, Aaron Surina, in this proceeding.
About The Author
