Document: REQUEST
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/526.0 REQUEST 2023-09-13 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-09-13
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: REQUEST
This document is a consolidated summary of the case Surina v Surina, with a focus on alleged misconduct by Sirinya Surina and perceived injustices faced by Aaron Surina. Aaron Surina, the father, requests the court to acknowledge several instances of unethical behavior by the mother, including defiance of the court-ordered parenting plan and Washington State’s relocation statutes.
Sirinya Surina is accused of deliberately removing their children from school, leading to truancy charges. She has reportedly violated court orders on five separate occasions, depriving the children of their education and Aaron of his lawful court-ordered time with them. Furthermore, she has informed school authorities about a change in residence and school for the eldest son without adhering to legal procedures.
The father also brings attention to a change in the mother’s circumstances. Previously a stay-at-home parent, she now holds a job, indicating that the parenting plan established in 2019 may no longer be fair or applicable.
In demonstrating his dedication to his children’s wellbeing, Aaron Surina offers to assume full financial responsibility for them. However, he is met with apparent court bias favoring Sirinya Surina. This bias is reflected in the court’s failure to enforce its own orders and its lack of response to the mother’s repeated defiance, ultimately depriving the father of his court-ordered rights and potentially harming the children’s education.
Furthermore, Aaron Surina raises concerns about Sirinya Surina’s questionable property transactions, suggesting a potential lack of transparency that could impact her credibility. Specifically, she purchased a residence at 9120 Silver in Cheney for $565,000 and listed another property for rent exactly 30 days after escrow closing.
Adding to the allegations against the mother, she provided conflicting statements to school authorities and the court regarding her moving status, suggesting an attempt to manipulate the situation unethically.
Aaron Surina requests the court to acknowledge these matters, arguing that they are not subject to reasonable dispute and can be readily verified from reliable sources. However, his concerns appear to have been overlooked, suggesting potential judicial bias and unfair treatment of Aaron Surina. This document thus highlights the need for a thorough evaluation of the case to ensure justice and fairness for Aaron Surina and his children.
About The Author
