Document: AFFIDAVIT OF RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://justice.surina.xyz/l3g4l/105.0 AFFIDAVIT OF RESPONDENT 2018-01-17 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-01-17
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Upon a comprehensive review of the court documents pertaining to Aaron Surina’s case, it is evident that my client has been subjected to a series of injustices, unethical conduct, and potential judicial bias. The documents reveal a disturbing pattern of disregard for the principles of fairness and impartiality, which are the bedrock of our justice system.
The documents suggest that Sirinya Surina, the petitioner, has filed false accusations against Aaron, attempting to mislead the court and discredit Aaron’s character. Despite Aaron’s efforts to protect his children from harm, he has been treated as the perpetrator rather than the victim. This bias is not only unjust but also detrimental to the welfare of the children involved.
The court documents reveal that Aaron’s children have sustained injuries while in the custody of their mother, with Aaron even possessing a video recording of an assault incident. Despite the evidence of abuse, Aaron has been advised against reporting these incidents by lawyers, and child services have allegedly been unresponsive to his pleas for help. This demonstrates a clear failure in the system to protect the welfare of Aaron’s children, which is both unethical and unjust.
Furthermore, the court documents show that the child was admitted to the Sacred Heart Medical Center following the alleged abuse. Despite the medical records indicating physical harm to the child, the court has failed to hold the alleged abuser accountable. This lack of action raises serious questions about the court’s commitment to justice and the protection of children’s rights.
Additionally, Aaron has been denied access to his belongings, which have been boxed up since August 2017, despite court permission to retrieve them. This has resulted in unnecessary financial burdens on my client, which is an unfair repercussion of the petitioner’s actions.
The court documents also suggest a possible bias against Aaron. Despite his efforts to protect his children and comply with the court’s instructions, he is being treated as the perpetrator rather than the victim. This bias is not only unjust but also detrimental to the welfare of the children involved.
In conclusion, the court documents reflect a disturbing pattern of judicial bias and unethical conduct against Aaron Surina. His rights as a father and a citizen have been violated, and his attempts to protect his sons have been thwarted by the very institution that is supposed to uphold justice. It is imperative that these injustices are rectified and Aaron is given the statutory relief he rightfully deserves.
About The Author
