Document: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/531.0 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2023-09-25 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-09-25
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document Title: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
The court documents reveal an apparent bias and potentially unethical conduct against Aaron Surina, who is served with a Motion for Contempt Hearing without any substantial evidence of his alleged disobedience. This raises questions about the fairness of the proceedings as it seems to indicate a presumption of guilt against Mr. Surina, without providing him a fair opportunity to defend himself.
The document contains unclear and potentially incoherent accusations against Mr. Surina that neither seem fair nor professional. Such accusations could reflect a lack of respect for his rights and a potential attempt to prejudice the court against him. Additionally, the document stipulates that the court may not allow Mr. Surina to testify at the motion hearing. This restriction on his right to a fair hearing further signifies a potential bias against him.
Moreover, the document exhibits a request for a money judgment against Mr. Surina, without providing clear specifics regarding the amount or dates, which suggests an attempt to impose an ambiguous financial burden on him. This lack of clarity potentially points towards unethical conduct.
The court document also requests Aaron to face potential penalties for alleged violations of parenting time orders, without providing clear evidence or details about these alleged violations. This lack of detail and transparency undermines Aaron’s rights to a fair hearing and representation, indicating a possible lack of due process.
The motion seeks approval for punitive measures that seem excessive and unjust, such as imposing a daily fine for supposed non-compliance with the court’s orders, requiring Aaron to pay for the opposing party’s legal fees and costs, and demanding make-up parenting time. Furthermore, it alludes to an unjust threat of imprisonment.
The document also allows the other party to propose any other relief allowed by law without specifying what these other reliefs could be. This lack of clarity seems to provide an open-ended opportunity for imposing further penalties on Aaron, which appears to be biased and unfair.
Overall, the document, from Aaron’s perspective, reflects a biased judicial process that appears to be more focused on punitive measures rather than ensuring a fair and balanced resolution. This could potentially result in unjust outcomes that infringe on Aaron’s rights as a father.
About The Author
