Document: AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/545.0 AFFIDAVIT 2023-10-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-10-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents, in summary, reveal a series of potentially prejudiced and unethical practices directed against Aaron Surina. Mr. Surina contends that the petitioner, Sirinya Surina, has persistently and deliberately violated extant court orders, which he argues has adversely impacted the emotional and psychological health of their children. This is in direct contravention of Washington State law, RCW 26, which maintains the necessity of a wholesome relationship with both parents for the child’s best interest.
Moreover, the current restraining order is notably stringent, barring the children from communicating with their father. This prohibition contradicts the tenets of the compulsory “Sharing the Children” seminar required in all Washington divorce cases and could potentially be classified as emotional abuse under RCW 26.09.191.
Mr. Surina also expresses concern about the potential risk of international child abduction due to the mother’s connections to Thailand and her threats of absconding with the children. This fear is not unfounded but rooted in tangible concerns.
The parenting plan also presents several perplexing and contradictory clauses, particularly concerning international travel. These ambiguities, according to Mr. Surina, are detrimental to all parties involved and create chances for exploitation and misunderstanding. This goes against the Washington State law’s mandate for clarity in such matters.
Mr. Surina underscores the need for urgent intervention given the significant concerns about the welfare of the children, the time-sensitive nature of these issues, and the accompanying risks. He appeals to the court to modify the restraining order and the parenting plan. This unjust and potentially prejudiced treatment of Mr. Surina highlights the requirement for a more balanced and impartial consideration of the case.
The document in question is an affidavit signed and attested by Aaron Surina. Despite not containing any specific claims or facts pertaining to his case, Mr. Surina affirms the validity of the provided information and comprehends the legal consequences of perjury. This document, however, does not permit the identification of instances of unethical conduct, bias, or injustice against him. It simply delineates the process and legal implications of signing an affidavit. Additional documents would be necessary to evaluate any unfairness or bias against Mr. Surina.
About The Author
