Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/546.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2023-10-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-10-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document Title: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
The document presents the ordeal of Aaron Surina, the respondent in a six-year divorce case, who alleges significant injustices, potential legal breaches and unethical conduct by his former spouse, Sirinya Surina. Aaron asserts that Sirinya has persistently violated court orders, leading to considerable financial losses and detrimental impacts on their children’s welfare. Despite a court ruling on December 20, 2019, mandating Sirinya to grant Aaron annual tax exemptions for their children, she has failed to comply, denying him access to stimulus and Child Tax Credit payments totaling $22,400 over two years.
Moreover, Aaron claims that Sirinya, despite her evident financial prosperity, has neglected her responsibilities towards their children, favoring her financial gain over their well-being. He further accuses her of identity theft, alleging she accessed and altered his personal information, including his healthcare account details. These actions have caused him significant distress and turmoil, suggesting an abuse of privacy and potential legal breach.
Aaron criticizes the court for its apparent bias, as it has not enforced its orders or held Sirinya accountable for her non-compliance. He emphasizes the need for judicial intervention to rectify the ongoing financial and emotional damage caused by her actions. He also calls for a resolution on custody and decision-making, highlighting the need for a judgment focusing on the well-being and stability of their children, Andrew and David.
Aaron’s plea for the court to uphold the principles of justice, fairness, and the best interests of their children underscores his belief in the court’s potential to correct these injustices and restore ethical conduct. Despite the document’s partial nature, it is evident that Aaron has endured significant hardship in trying to protect his children’s interests, thus pleading for the court’s intervention to rectify the ongoing turmoil and financial losses caused by the petitioner’s actions.