Document: AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/548.0 AFFIDAVIT 2023-10-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-10-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: AFFIDAVIT
Summary:
Aaron Surina’s court documents present a compelling case of consistent failure by Sirinya Surina to fulfill her court-ordered financial obligations towards their children. Sirinya’s refusal to contribute to essential expenses, such as healthcare and personal development activities, appears to be a deliberate attempt to shift the entire financial burden onto Aaron. This is not due to her financial limitations but a calculated decision to evade her responsibilities, which is detrimental to their children’s overall well-being.
The documents detail multiple instances where Sirinya declined to contribute to medical bills and other expenses such as karate classes, despite a court order directing her to do so. The expenses include medical bills for Sirinya amounting to $266.00, a general medical bill for their son David totaling $309.00, and an emergency room bill for their son Andrew’s head injury at $503.00. Sirinya has also not paid for a karate class and an ER visit, both costs were to be split 50/50, amounting to $52.50 and $240.00 respectively.
This pattern of refusal indicates unethical conduct by Sirinya, as it demonstrates her lack of commitment to share in the financial responsibility of raising their children. Aaron has meticulously kept a record of the refused expenses and expects the court to take this evidence into account.
Despite Aaron’s effort to provide concrete evidence of Sirinya’s non-compliance, the court appears to have shown bias by not adequately addressing her consistent refusal to meet her financial obligations. This perceived bias and the lack of consequences for Sirinya’s actions have forced Aaron to bear an unfair financial burden, negatively impacting the welfare of their children.
Aaron’s sworn affidavit reflects his deep involvement and ongoing concern for the welfare of his children. He willingly gave his statement without coercion or duress, understanding the legal consequences of providing false information.
In summary, Aaron Surina’s interpretation of the documents and the evidence he has presented to the court suggest a pattern of unethical conduct by Sirinya Surina, a perceived judicial bias, and a lack of fairness in the distribution of financial responsibilities. These factors collectively represent a significant injustice against him and their children.
About The Author
