Document: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/555.0 PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS 2023-10-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-10-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document Title: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
The court documents imply that Aaron Surina may be facing allegations of non-compliance with certain court orders, yet they lack clarity and specificity about the said disobedience. The documents ambiguously mention potential issues related to child support, medical support, children’s expenses, and spousal support, without clear indications of the specific orders Aaron allegedly failed to fulfill. The documents further suggest a contempt hearing about the parenting/custody order, yet fail to provide concrete details of Aaron’s alleged disobedience.
The documents reveal potential unfairness against Aaron as they do not consider his ability to follow the orders, both in the past or currently. This lack of information signifies a possible bias against Aaron, failing to account for his circumstances or reasons for any supposed non-compliance.
Further evidence of potential bias is seen in the documents’ suggestion that Aaron acted in bad faith, a claim made without providing any clear justification or evidence. The documents also imply that Aaron may have to bear lawyer fees and costs, without clarity on whether these costs are justified or reasonable. This potential financial burden on Aaron can be seen as an additional form of injustice.
The documents also hint at the possibility of Aaron being held in contempt of court, potentially leading to jail time. However, these severe potential consequences lack a detailed explanation or clear evidence of wrongdoing, which could be interpreted as an extreme and unjust response.
The documents are riddled with blank sections and indecipherable phrases, leading to potential misunderstanding and misinterpretation. For instance, key information such as conditions for the suspension of jail time and the court review hearing date are left blank, potentially obstructing Aaron from fully understanding and complying with court orders.
Lastly, the document includes a section indicating that it may be signed by the court without notice to Aaron. This can be perceived as unethical, potentially depriving Aaron of his right to be fully informed about all decisions related to his case, thereby undermining the principles of transparency and fairness.
In summary, these court documents appear to unfairly target Aaron Surina, lacking in clarity, specificity, and justification. The potential bias, unethical conduct, and unprofessional handling of the documents raise serious questions about the fairness of proceedings, placing an undue burden on Aaron.
About The Author
