Document: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/557.0 PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS 2023-10-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-10-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: COMBINED SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
The court document reveals numerous instances of unethical conduct, potential bias, and possible misconduct against Aaron Surina. Sirinya Surina’s consistent failure to comply with child support obligations and court orders related to the children’s medical support has imposed significant financial burdens on Aaron, amounting to over $30,000 in lost tax returns and stimulus.
The contempt hearing did not address key aspects such as the parenting plan, residential schedule, or custody order, indicating a potential disregard for Aaron’s rights as a parent. Furthermore, the document lacks clarity regarding the parties’ ability or willingness to follow orders, leaving Aaron in a state of uncertainty.
An additional financial burden placed on Aaron is the court-ordered money judgment against Sirinya, amounting to $36,000. The document does not specify whether Aaron is expected to bear this cost, fueling concerns over economic injustice. A civil penalty related to a violation of a parenting or custody order is mentioned but lacks details, leading to ambiguity and potential bias against Aaron.
The document’s vague nature and lack of transparency, including unspecified make-up parenting time and jail time, may be interpreted as reflective of the court’s bias against Aaron. The Proposed Order Findings accuse him of refusing to contribute to the children’s needs and care, a claim he believes to be unsubstantiated and unfair.
In addition, the documents are presented by the opposing party without any notice to Aaron, which can be seen as an unethical deprivation of his opportunity to respond or contest the allegations. This imbalance of representation and lack of a fair hearing represent potential injustices against Surina.
In conclusion, these court documents appear to unfairly and perhaps unethically disadvantage Aaron Surina, without providing him with clear information or due consideration of his parental rights or financial situation. The continuous disregard for his rights and the undue financial pressure imposed on him highlight a pressing need for a fair and unbiased review of his case.
About The Author
