Document: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/558.0 PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS 2023-10-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-10-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Final Summary:
The court documents, as seen from Aaron Surina’s viewpoint, exhibit perceived bias, unfairness and potentially unethical conduct. Despite a lack of clear evidence or explanation, the court has found him to owe a significant amount of $36,000 for past due children’s expenses. Moreover, without detailing the specific violation, a civil penalty has been imposed on him for an alleged violation of a parenting or custody order.
These documents also indicate a contempt charge against Sirinya Surina, Aaron’s ex-spouse, but do not elaborate on the details or consequences related to this finding. This lack of balance in the proceedings raises questions about the impartiality of the court. Further, Sirinya’s consistent non-compliance with court orders, specifically one dated December 20, 2019, regarding child support payments, has not been addressed adequately by the court. This non-compliance has caused significant issues for Aaron, including financial strain, yet the court seems to overlook this.
The documents were presented without any notice to Aaron, a clear violation of his right to be informed, and an indication of unethical conduct by the court. This lack of transparency, coupled with an accusation of Aaron refusing to contribute to his children’s needs without any clear evidence, implies a negative bias against him. Furthermore, there is no resolution regarding Aaron’s parenting time or custody rights, adding to the uncertainty and upheaval he faces.
In conclusion, the court documents suggest a potential injustice against Aaron Surina, with unfair financial obligations placed on him without clear explanations, a lack of due process, and perceived favoritism towards his ex-spouse despite her intentional non-compliance with court orders. These factors collectively hint at a biased and unjust treatment of his case, revealing potential ethical concerns in the legal process.
About The Author
