Document: ORDER ON CONTEMPT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/563.0 ORDER ON CONTEMPT 2023-10-31 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-10-31
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court document, “Order on Contempt,” hints at possible bias against Aaron Surina, the respondent, and father, in a case involving a Motion for Contempt Hearing. Petitioner, Sirinya Surina, was accused of non-compliance with a support order regarding the provision of tax form 8332. Despite these accusations, the court ruled her not in contempt. This ruling suggests a potential bias against Mr. Surina, as it appears his concerns were not adequately considered.
The court held a Contempt Hearing but did not issue any judgments or orders addressing Aaron Surina’s concerns. Despite a finding that the parenting/custody order was obeyed, it remains unclear whether the court thoroughly examined Aaron’s claims of non-compliance. This lack of clarity further suggests possible unfair treatment of Mr. Surina.
Additionally, the court made no provisions for attorney fees and costs, potentially burdening Aaron Surina with his legal expenses. This could be perceived as an injustice, especially if Mr. Surina had valid reasons for his initial complaint. The order also doesn’t cover any restraining orders or other orders, suggesting that the scope of the hearing might have been too narrow to fully address Mr. Surina’s issues.
The document also contains contact information for Stanley A. Kempner, Jr, an attorney at law, but does not detail his actions, decisions, or behaviors related to the case. Without more comprehensive information, it is challenging to identify any unfair or unethical conduct against Mr. Surina in this context.
In summary, the document indicates potential bias and unjust treatment towards Aaron Surina, with his concerns seemingly dismissed without thorough investigation or consideration. Further evidence is required to substantiate any claims of unethical conduct by the attorneys involved.
About The Author
