Document: REQUEST
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/569.0 REQUEST 2024-03-01 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-03-01
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: REQUEST
The court documents reveal a series of unjust actions by the Petitioner, Sirinya Surina, highlighted by Aaron Surina, the father, drawing attention to a consistent disregard for legal norms, court orders, and the welfare of their children. Aaron underscores Sirinya’s violation of Washington’s relocation statutes (RCW 26.09.520), which adversely affects the children’s interests and his parental rights.
Repeated non-compliance with court orders by Sirinya indicates a severe disrespect for the judicial process and negatively impacts the children’s welfare while undermining the legal proceedings. Aaron also brings attention to Sirinya’s evasion of financial obligations, a move that further harms the children’s welfare and prevents an equitable resolution.
Further, Aaron criticizes Sirinya’s contempt of court, refusal to facilitate communication between him and the children, and unilateral actions that disrupt the children’s stability. Sirinya’s misuse of legal resources and neglect of the children’s needs, he argues, reveal a prioritization of personal vendetta over the children’s welfare.
In the documents, Aaron also submits a notarized request for the court to take judicial notice, as provided in the relevant rules. He urges the court to uphold principles of fairness and transparency by allowing him the opportunity to be heard regarding the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the matter under consideration. He emphasizes the importance of the court not undermining his rights by overlooking his request or exercising discretionary powers in a potentially biased or prejudiced manner.
The court must adhere to the rule of judicial notice of adjudicative facts, which mandates judicial notice when a party requests and provides the necessary information. This rule also dictates that a judicially noticed fact must be generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or capable of accurate determination by resort to unquestionably accurate sources. If not adhered to, it could signify unethical conduct.
Aaron Surina indicates that if his request for judicial notice is ignored or delayed, it may reflect bias and injustice against him. He insists on the court’s commitment to uphold the principles of fairness and impartiality in its proceedings. He implores the court to acknowledge Sirinya’s disregard for legal norms and the children’s best interests, urging a decision that reinstates the principles of justice and equity.
About The Author
