Document: MOTION
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/571.0 MOTION 2024-03-01 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-03-01
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: MOTION
The motion presented by Aaron Surina reflects his belief in the existence of unfairness, possible unethical conduct, and obstruction of his right to a fair trial within the court proceedings. Mr. Surina has requested the court to strike the declaration of Alia, a paid employee of the petitioner, from the record due to concerns about the credibility of her statement. This declaration heavily relies on uncorroborated testimonies without firsthand knowledge, potentially introducing bias into the evidence.
The petitioner’s consistent defiance of court orders and refusal to participate in discovery processes raises concerns about the integrity of the legal proceedings. Unjust objections from the petitioner to reasonable inquiries into the credibility of the witnesses and the refusal to provide pertinent information about their employees also underscore this issue. This refusal, coupled with objections to interrogatories based on relevance, further fuels Mr. Surina’s concerns about bias and unethical conduct.
Mr. Surina has criticized the opposing counsel, including Stanley Kempner and Keith Glanzer, for their lack of candor towards him as a pro se litigant, which he perceives as an indication of unethical behavior. He asserts that the actions of the petitioner’s representation are undermining the principles of fairness, credibility, and due process.
In essence, Mr. Surina’s motion is a plea for the preservation of the integrity of the proceedings and the upholding of the principles of fairness and due process, which he considers to be currently at risk. He requests the court’s assistance in drafting legal documents due to the controversy and potential injustices arising from the petitioner’s conduct. Thus, striking the declaration of Alia from the evidence is seen as crucial in mitigating the potential bias and ensuring a fair hearing for Mr. Surina.