Document: MEMORANDUM
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/577.0 MEMORANDUM 2024-03-06 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-03-06
Summary (Justice Demanded)
MEMORANDUM SUMMARY:
The court proceedings and documents reveal a discernible bias against Aaron Surina that could be seen as a violation of his rights. The court’s decision to allow Ms. Surina to relocate with their children from Spokane to Cheney was made without considering Mr. Surina’s objections, negatively impacting the children’s routine and education. The court further allowed Ms. Surina sole decision-making power over their children’s lives, which seems punitive towards Mr. Surina and neglects his parental rights.
Mr. Surina’s legal actions were dismissed by the court and labeled as “frivolous” and “nonsensical”, potentially indicating a bias against him. His previous complaints against Spokane County Superior Court justices and his ex-spouse’s attorney were similarly dismissed, with attorney fees awarded against him. This could be perceived as a miscarriage of justice, as he was merely exercising his constitutional rights.
Further, the court’s dismissal of Mr. Surina’s attempt to enforce an out-of-state custody order and the application of a rebuttable presumption favoring Ms. Surina’s relocation based on Mr. Surina’s lack of “substantially equal residential time”, disregard the emotional and developmental effects on the children due to reduced contact with their father.
The court documents also suggest an undue burden on Mr. Surina to challenge the presumption for relocation, implying a preformed opinion unfavorable to him. Labeling Mr. Surina’s objections as ‘vexatious litigation’ rather than acknowledging them as legitimate concerns for his children portrays a bias against him.
Moreover, allegations of “repeatedly engaging in abusive use of conflict” made against Mr. Surina are not substantiated with evidence, suggesting an unfair portrayal of him. Decisions such as the proposed relocation, which increases Mr. Surina’s travel time to see his children without altering the existing parenting plan or child support, further indicate a lack of consideration for Mr. Surina’s circumstances.
Overall, these documents suggest a systemic bias against Mr. Surina, potentially undermining his rights and efforts to protect his children’s best interests. His attempts to exercise his parental rights and seek justice are unfairly dismissed and penalized, highlighting potential injustices and unethical conduct.
About The Author
