Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//596.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2024-04-01 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-04-01
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document, titled “AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT,” provides a comprehensive account from Aaron Surina’s perspective in response to the legal proceedings involving his children, David Surina and Andrew Surina. Aaron Surina, representing himself, vehemently opposes the petitioner’s motion for sanctions and an order restricting him from engaging in litigation, citing several crucial points. He argues against the petitioner’s attorney’s fees, emphasizing overlooked information such as his son’s potential learning disability and his efforts to support his children by relocating near their schools. Aaron asserts that his legal actions were driven by genuine concerns for his children’s welfare and were not frivolous or made in bad faith. He underscores his right to participate in legal proceedings to protect his relationship with his children and ensure their best interests, raising concerns about the impact of relocation on their schooling and overall well-being. Despite facing financial hardships and the inability to afford legal counsel, Aaron remains committed to his children’s welfare.
The document further reveals a disturbing pattern of unethical conduct, judicial bias, and injustices against Aaron and his children. The petitioner’s counsel consistently labels Aaron as vexatious to evade accountability for non-compliance with court orders, displaying clear bias. Aaron has been compelled to file motions due to the petitioner’s refusal to adhere to court orders or engage in compromise, indicating a lack of cooperation and respect for legal protocols. The opposing counsel’s unpreparedness and focus on disparaging Aaron rather than addressing substantive issues underscore unethical behavior and a disregard for the children’s welfare. The court’s recognition of the petitioner’s actions as akin to abduction and its failure to uphold Aaron’s rights and protect his children from harm highlight systemic failures in the legal proceedings.
Moreover, the document exposes instances of the petitioner’s unethical conduct, including leaving the children unsupervised and violating court orders, casting doubt on her commitment to the children’s best interests. Aaron expresses concerns about the lack of scheduling hindering his access to justice and the petitioner’s actions driven by a desire for control rather than co-parenting. The document also points to the petitioner’s counsel being unprepared and misrepresenting their client, potentially warranting sanctions. Aaron emphasizes the importance of upholding his parental rights and seeking fair treatment under the law, urging the court to rectify the injustices and biases prevalent in the case.
In summary, the document portrays a narrative of egregious injustices, unethical conduct, and judicial bias against Aaron Surina and his children, underscoring the urgent need for a fair and unbiased review of the case to ensure justice prevails for the family.
About The Author
