Document: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//60.0 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2017-10-19 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-10-19
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, the Order to Show Cause document reflects potential unethical conduct and judicial bias. The document indicates that Aaron Surina has been ordered to appear in court for a Contempt Hearing based on a motion filed by the Petitioner, Sirinya Surina. The court has approved this order without providing a detailed explanation or considering Aaron’s side of the story.
The document fails to mention any specific allegations or evidence of contempt against Aaron, raising concerns about due process and fairness. The lack of transparency in the court’s decision-making process suggests potential bias in favor of the Petitioner. Additionally, the warning that the court may approve the other party’s requests without hearing Aaron’s side and issue a warrant for his arrest if he fails to appear further highlights the imbalance of power and potential injustices in the legal proceedings.
Furthermore, the involvement of the Petitioner’s attorney, Keith A. Glanzer, in presenting the motion for the Contempt Hearing raises questions about conflicts of interest and potential collusion between the attorney and the court. The document does not provide any information about Aaron’s legal representation or his ability to afford a lawyer, indicating a lack of consideration for his rights and well-being.
Overall, the Order to Show Cause document reflects a concerning lack of fairness, transparency, and due process in the legal proceedings involving Aaron Surina. The potential unethical conduct, judicial bias, and injustices apparent in the document highlight the need for a thorough review of the case to ensure the protection of Aaron and his two sons’ rights and well-being.
About The Author
